
Portable Data Storage -- When PC Cards Are Too Big
In 1989, the PCMCIA (Personal Computer Memory Card International
Association) published their PC Card specifications, a set of guidelines
for the physical and electrical specifications of the PC Card and
corresponding socket. Three types of cards (Type I, II, and III) were
eventually defined, all of the same width (54 mm) and length (85.6
mm), but with different thicknesses: Type I cards are 3.3 mm thick;
Type II, 5 mm; and Type III, 10.5 mm. All cards use the same 68-pin
connector.
PC Cards were targeted mostly at mobile computers, and the size of
the cards was ideal for that application. Other systems are smaller
than notebooks, however, and the size of the PC Card limits design
flexibility and further system miniaturization. Examples of such systems
include digital cameras, personal digital assistants, and voice recorders.
It is these systems that drive the current search for a new, yet smaller,
card form factor. Most of these applications only require a data storage
solution -- usually flash memory -- to store images, text, or audio.
Card-based processing power is seldom needed.
Six small form factor portable data storage cards are discussed below.
1. CompactFlash Cards
The CompactFlash Card design was first proposed by SanDisk in early
1995, and production started in late 1995. This (and the fact that
SanDisk is the world's largest supplier of flash data storage products)
has given CompactFlash a headstart compared to other cards.
2. Miniature Card
The Miniature Card format is supported by Intel and AMD (the leading
flash memory manufacturers) as well some sixty other companies, including
Compaq (PCs), Olympus (cameras), and Nokia (phones). Intel's Miniature
Card is illustrated above.
3. SmartMedia Cards
Smart Media Cards, or SSFDC (Solid State Floppy Disk
Cards) as they were known until recently, were developed by Toshiba
and Samsung and are based on smart card technology. SmartMedia is
currently backed by about sixty member companies -- mostly Japanese-based
consumer electronics companies.
 |
 |
 |
| SmartMedia Card -The picture on the right
is an x-ray of the die module. Note the wirebonds from the
die to the traces which lead to plated-through holes. |
4. MultiMedia Card
The MultiMedia Card was developed by Siemens. It is not yet in production,
but Siemens is currently founding an association to support the MultiMedia
Card format and hopes to start production before the end of 1997.
Sampling is to start in September 1997.
5. Mega Storage Device
Panasonic recently announced the development of the Mega Storage
Device, previously known in Japan as the SmallPC Card. It is targeted
at digital cameras, personal digital assistants, and other portable
devices.
6. NexFlash Serial Flash Module
Nexcom, a California company that has patented a novel flash memory
technology, has developed a different memory card based on their flash
technology. The Serial Flash Module is offered to Nexcom's customers
as a packaging option. Most modules probably will be used in enclosed
systems that use the module for upgrades or expansions.
Ultra Low Cost Packaging
It is too early to tell which format will be the preferred choice.
Regardless of the outcome in the portable data storage market, the
packaging approaches are interesting from a low cost packaging point
of view. As the prices of the cards already suggest, the cost structures
are quite different, and are driven by the following cost items:
- Substrate -- The CompactFlash, Miniature, NexFlash and
Mega Storage Device cards use FR4 printed circuit boards of various
complexity and cost. Of lower cost are the SmartMedia Cards' thin,
double-sided FR4 substrates that are manufactured in a reel-to-reel
process and the leadframe that is used in the MultiMedia Card.
In the future, Siemens plans to use a Molded Interconnection Device
(MID) which would provide both the substrate and the card body,
promising additional cost savings.
- Connector -- The CompactFlash and Mega Storage Device cards
use a pin and socket connector. The Miniature Card uses an elastomeric
connector and the other cards use surface pads.
- IC Packaging -- The SmartMedia and the MultiMedia cards
achieve lower cost structures by wirebonding the bare memory die
directly onto the respective substrates.
- Card Assembly -- The CompactFlash, Miniature, and Mega
Storage Device card constructions package a printed circuit board
into a metal enclosure, a design that adds cost and complexity to
he assembly process. The SmartMedia Card, on the other hand, uses
a simple plastic card body into which the die module is glued. Perhaps
even simpler, the body of the MultiMedia card is defined by over-molding
the die assembly. NexFlash does not use any casing at all.
As electronics becomes ever more pervasive and penetrates products
that were previously not considered electronics systems such as refrigerators,
cameras, and parking tickets, there will develop a need for novel
packaging technologies that do not follow the traditional component-on-board
approach. With this in mind, perhaps the most interesting and successful
packaging approach is the smart card, and it is not a coincidence
that some of the lowest cost packaging technologies used in portable
data storage products were borrowed from smart cards.
Some 700 million smart cards were manufactured in 1996, mostly in
Europe where they are being used for an ever wider range of applications.
A disposable pre-paid phone smart card can cost as little as $0.40
in high volumes. This includes:
- A plastic card body, typically laminated or injection-molded and
printed with graphics
- A memory chip measuring up to 2 x 2 mm, 5-6 I/O wirebonded and
encapsulated
- A die module substrate consisting of a single-sided FR4 tape with
gold-plated contact pads
Some smart card constructions even eliminate the die module substrate
by implanting the die upside-down (quasi-flip chip) directly into
the plastic card body and printing the external contact pads with
conductive paste.
The opportunities in electronics are boundless. Please call a Partner
at Prismark Partners.
Copyright 1997 Integrated Electronics Engineering Center and Prismark
Partners LLC.
09/97
Warranty Disclaimer -- All information used in the preparation of
this report was obtained from sources believed to be reliable at the
time the information was collected. Prismark Partners LLC, its employees,
its agents, and assignees have exercised their best efforts in preparing
this report. Prismark Partners LLC extends no warranties with respect
to this information and shall bear no liability whatsoever to the
report recipient or to any other party as a result of the use of this
report or the information contained herein.